It's been postponed for a day due to the pope's funeral, but it looks
as if Prince Charles is finally going to marry the woman he apparently
wanted to marry in the first place.
[dubiously] I'm sure she's very nice.
At least I'm reasonably confidant this
marriage shan't hit the skids as did his marriage to Diana
Spencer. Even now that's depressing to think about; it was
such a festive time for us English Royalty Watchers! Got up at
some ludicrously early hour of the morning to turn on the TV and watch
Charles and Diana marry.
Actually, I got up at ludicrously early hours to watch his sister,
Anne, marry whatever his name was, and Andrew marry Sarah Ferguson.
That's right. The one thing all three marriages had in common was I got up and watched them. Cause and effect?
I don't recall whether Edward's wedding to, um, dang, what IS her name?
was televised, but I didn't see it if so. First because I have a
hard enough time sleeping without deliberately waking up to watch the
wedding of people I don't even know, and second because based upon past
experience, if I tune in, that marriage is doomed.
So I'll content myself with reading about Charles and Camilla's nuptials on the internet and in Time.
This is interesting, though! It's been said by Charles' office
that upon his (finally) ascending the throne, Camilla will be known as
the Princess Consort. Turns out that is not what the law
says....she'd be queen, period. Queen Consort, maybe, but still
queen. For the Princess Consort business to work the law will
have to be changed, and not only in England, but New Zealand,
Australia, Canada, and whichever country is still part of the British
Empire.
Might be a problem with that, as those countries have fairly large
segments of the population that would just as soon ditch the monarchy
entirely, and putting that law on the table for amendment would provide
an excellent opportunity for that to take place.
Charles' marriage to Camilla Parker-Bowles isn't wildly popular in any
case . . . can you imagine the snit people in England would be in if
they wind up "losing" Australia, for example, because of it?
Recent Comments